awayliner.blogg.se

Tunnelblick resolving domain name
Tunnelblick resolving domain name










tunnelblick resolving domain name

  • Remedies may include cancellation, transfer, actual damages, statutory damages of $1,000 to $100,000 per name, and in exceptional cases, attorney’s fees are possible.
  • Permits in rem actions against the name itself.
  • Plaintiff must show bad faith on part of registrant.
  • Complainants won 83% of cases before single member panels, but only 58% of cases before three member panelsĪnticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA).
  • Complainants won only 63.4% of time before eResolution (now out of business).
  • Complainants won 82.2% when before WIPO.
  • Respondent’s site of residence is presumed to be the location listed in the WHOIS lookup databaseĭispute Resolution Provider Choices Prof.
  • Can take an unfavorable decision to a court where Registrar or Respondent resides (although a losing Respondent must do so within 10 days).
  • Policy permits simultaneous pursuit of remedies in court.
  • Legitimate noncommercial or fair use, where there is no attempt at commercial gain, misleading consumers, or tarnishing mark.
  • Respondent being commonly known by the name (even where no trademark in name).
  • Respondent’s use of the name or a similar name in commerce prior to the dispute.
  • Registering a name to deliberately confuse consumers, when done for commercial gain.
  • Registering the name to disrupt a competitor’s business.
  • Registering name to prevent Complainant’s use of the name (if part of a pattern).
  • Obtaining name to sell to Complainant or its competitor.
  • The dispute resolution provider serves the Respondent.
  • The Complainant serves the chosen dispute resolution provider.
  • Number of Panelists desired (one or three).
  • Why Respondent does not have legitimate interests in the name.
  • Manner in which DN is confusingly similar.
  • Trademarks upon which complaint is based.
  • Asian Domain Name Domain Name Dispute Resolution Centre.
  • World Intellectual Property Organization.
  • Individual Dispute Resolution Provider Supplemental Rules for the Policy.
  • Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)
  • Renewals of gTLD Domain Names Required Acceptance of Policy.
  • Applies to All Global Top-Level Domains.
  • ICANN’s Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)
  • Designed to Represent Interests of Industry, Governments and Consumers.
  • Determines Acceptable Global Top-Level Domains (e.g.aero.
  • Responsible for Administering All Global Top-Level Domains (gTLD).
  • Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
  • Foreign Nations’ Feeling of Insufficient Respect.
  • tunnelblick resolving domain name

  • Network Solutions Domain Name Suspension Policy for Disputes.
  • Concentration of Power – Network Solutions.
  • Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act.
  • Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers’ Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy.











  • Tunnelblick resolving domain name